Sample Size Formula:
From: | To: |
Power analysis for superiority trials determines the sample size needed to detect a statistically significant difference between treatment groups when one treatment is expected to be superior to another. It ensures the study has adequate power to detect the hypothesized effect size.
The calculator uses the standard sample size formula for continuous outcomes:
Where:
Explanation: This formula calculates the number of participants needed in each group to detect a specified effect size with given statistical power and significance level.
Details: Proper sample size calculation is crucial for clinical trial design. It ensures the study has sufficient power to detect meaningful differences while controlling Type I and Type II errors, optimizing resource allocation and ethical considerations.
Tips: Enter alpha (typically 0.05), power (typically 0.8 or 0.9), standard deviation based on pilot data or literature, and the minimum clinically important difference you wish to detect.
Q1: What is the difference between superiority and non-inferiority trials?
A: Superiority trials aim to show one treatment is better than another, while non-inferiority trials aim to show a new treatment is not worse than an existing one by a pre-specified margin.
Q2: How do I determine the appropriate effect size?
A: Effect size should be based on clinical relevance, previous studies, or pilot data. It represents the minimum difference considered important in clinical practice.
Q3: What are typical values for alpha and power?
A: Alpha is typically 0.05 (5% significance level), and power is typically 0.8 or 0.9 (80% or 90% chance of detecting a true effect).
Q4: Can this formula be used for binary outcomes?
A: No, this formula is for continuous outcomes. Binary outcomes require a different formula based on proportions.
Q5: Should I adjust for multiple comparisons?
A: Yes, if conducting multiple tests, consider adjusting alpha (e.g., Bonferroni correction) to maintain the overall Type I error rate.